The article praised Hilary Clinton’s potential run for the presidency in 2016. That is no real surprise. But when the suggestion was made that Hilary already had a running mate in mind the gagging began. The article stated that Hilary was weighing the possibility of having Michelle Obama on the ticket as her vice-presidential running-mate. Now, I cannot stomach Hilary Clinton for very long and I absolutely have no use for Michelle Obama so you can see how rapidly the illness overpowered me when this image of the two…a strange sort of dynamic duo painted itself into my brain
Of course, the media and the liberal sector are slobbering all over themselves thinking that this is a USDA Grade-A Winner which will guarantee that the progressive liberal establishment stays in power employing the purported talents of both the Clinton and Obama in the dismantling of what we once knew as The United States of America. The liberals will dance, the feminists will dance, the socialist will dance, the communist will dance, and even the transgender cross-dressers will dance in celebration just imagining what can come of such a powerful concoction as this pairing.
From a common sense viewpoint, let us ponder this a bit before we even consider any dance. Personally, I thought Hilary Clinton was a train-wreck as Secretary of State. Was there anything that she accomplished? Oh…that’s right…she got four Americans killed in Benghazi…quite a feat. Maybe that is a bridge too far but let’s just say that when I consider my next president, I had rather not dwell upon a woman who apparently sat by lamely while four Americans died only to show up in front of a Congressional investigating committee and launch into a tirade demanding to know what difference it makes if four Americans die either out walking or at the hands of armed protestors….what difference does it make, Senator? That was the essence of her testimony and she walked on it. I don’t need a president who explains foreign affairs involving the death of American in a tirade and so incompletely. I see no morsel of leadership or sincerity in that attitude.
As for Michelle Obama, well, one does not have to ponder very long to realize that even the office of vice-president is well beyond the scope of either her abilities or her experience. Politics, other than pandering to liberals, does not suite her demeanor or her attitude. How could she possibly get through a State of the Union speech sitting behind the president without some series of obvious eye-rolls and sour expressions? Personally, I believe she will miss her calling if she goes in this direction and does not give serious consideration to her God-given talents as a travel agent. Apparently she is very good at planning vacations….very expensive vacations. Was that a sigh of relief that I heard from Hilary’s corner? Oh yes, Hilary, you get the double bonus of Michelle’s liberal draw on her husband’s namesake along with the satisfaction of knowing that you won’t have to worry about Michelle interfering with your presidency…she will be on vacation somewhere most of the time…probably near a golf course on the government’s tab no less. Just when you thought that the vice presidency could not be any less served by the likes of Joe Biden, the suggestion of Michelle in that office makes “Uncle Joe” look like a “Magna Cum Laude”. Don’t worry Joe…if she is on the ticket, you’ll never be rated as last in the history of the office.
America, at least the one that we have known, is going to have a very difficult time surviving the remainder of Barack Obama’s second term in office. There will not be any meat left on the bone to tolerate Hilary and Michelle there behind him. I suppose one could assume that such a consideration would drive the urgency of the right side of the aisle to do something very intelligent and offer up a candidate who was actually sane enough to bring some leadership back to the office of the president. There are those out there who actually claim that Hilary Clinton is the “smartest woman in the world” but the world has yet to see any evidence of that claim. Her performance as Secretary of State has been labeled “record-setting” by the left wing media using the number of miles covered in flight and the number of countries visited as the measure of her accomplishments and success. Let’s not confuse activity with successful outcomes here. The only real success on her part was the repeated attempts to pedal our country and its people over to UN control and we likely have not seen the culmination of those efforts as of yet.
Of course there are groups of pumped-up liberals out there talking about what an absolutely brilliant idea this is on the Democrat side…like shooting fish in a barrel in 2016. Likely the jury is still out on that conclusion in my mind. Hilary still must answer for Benghazi even though Obama has already thrown her under the bus for it. Obama is not going to answer for it and the American people are not going to forget about it, especially when a presidential election is at stake. The questions will be raised again and again. As that happens, one must wonder how long it will take for Hilary to launch another tirade in her anger over the matter. If the media and the American public allow her to slide on this issue and collect the White House as her reward, then we have all the evidence we need to realize that the country has gone outhouse rat-crazy and the ship is doomed to spend at least an additional four years without a captain at the helm. My guess is the 2014 mid-terms elections will be a precursor as to how easy it will be for Hilary to hang her hat in the Oval Office.
The mere suggestion of a Clinton/Obama ticket speaks volumes as to where the intelligence level of this country lies. At some point in our history, we must have given up on the qualities of leadership skill and focused our attention wholly on square-filling. What it says is that if the election were a horse-race, the Democrats would rather run a pony shot-up on Dexedrine than pick one with a bloodline as a winner and leader. The win is of absolute importance for without it, America will not continue down this socialist path we currently trod as a nation.
The manipulation of race and feminism to gain a win has more value than what the candidate brings to the table as a person and a leader. The Democrats can run with Hilary because she can turn out the feminine vote and Michelle can add the black and Latino vote to that mix. The union vote stays locked in and of course those standing in line for the next government hand-out can only rub their anxious palms together in anticipation of even more coming their way in exchange for their vote. In no instance in this crowd will there be any consideration of the consequences of an election with this outcome. It will be the utopian liberal campaign based on gender and race. Anyone, standing up now, including me as a writer, who raises that question and expresses any doubt immediately must wear the label of one furthering the war on women and fanning the flames of racism. The election will be about neither one so the liberals will claim. One does not have to ponder very long to understand why the concept of a war on women and racism are some of the most potent tools in the liberal war-chest; especially with low-information voters…oops, I must be conducting a war on those folks as well!
Hopefully the voters of this nation will wake up one day soon realizing that electing a president or a person heading to Congress is in no way something to be looked upon as a Hollywood awards dinner or a high school popularity contest. There are indeed many women out there very capable of fulfilling the role as a president and leader of the free world, there is no arguing that fact. But, none among them bear the names Hilary Clinton or Michelle Obama. As long as we enter the polling booth as a people wanting to be wooed by those who will give us “free stuff” and keep the “circus mentality” alive in Washington D.C., we can expect to have to pay the piper for the consequences of such choices. We have already had too many voters enter the polling booth to cast their vote for a president first and foremost on the basis of race without weighing much of anything else. For that, we have paid a price. Now the suggestion that the criteria to win should revolve around “gender” simply suggests that we have not learned anything from our past sins.
©Copyright WBrown2013. All Rights Reserved.
15 March 2013